Speculation
I was upset, though, by the New York Times incorporating into its reporting on this story an analysis of the political ramifications of Warner's decision. Warner is widely speculated to be a viable contender for the Democratic nomination for President in 2008. The Times leaves the reader with the impression that this decision was tempered in significant part by Warner's political calculations as he anticipates a Presidential run.
The problem with this is that Warner has presided over 11 executions. As governor, he's had 11 opportunities to appease the liberal base of his party by granting clemency before an execution. 11 times he didn't grant clemency. Could it be that Warner made this decision because there really was doubt in Lovitt's case?
How nice it would be if newspapers actually reported the news instead of incorporating rank speculation into their accounts.